If you're asking "what is Letter 226-J," you've likely either received one of these notices or want to understand the IRS enforcement mechanism for Affordable Care Act (ACA) compliance. Letter 226-J is the official IRS notice used to propose Employer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP) penalties against Applicable Large Employers who may have failed to comply with the ACA's employer mandate. Receiving this letter signals that the IRS believes your organization owes potentially substantial penalties, making it one of the most consequential tax notices an employer can receive.
Letter 226-J represents the IRS's primary enforcement tool for the ACA employer mandate under Internal Revenue Code Section 4980H. When the IRS data-matching process identifies potential non-compliance, such as full-time employees receiving premium tax credits for Marketplace coverage when they should have been offered employer-sponsored coverage, the agency sends Letter 226-J to initiate the penalty assessment process. Understanding what this letter is, what it contains, and how to respond is essential for any Applicable Large Employer seeking to protect itself from substantial financial consequences.
The stakes involved with Letter 226-J are significant. For tax year 2025, the Section 4980H(a) penalty is $2,970 per full-time employee (minus the first 30), and the Section 4980H(b) penalty is $4,460 per employee receiving premium tax credits. A mid-sized employer with 500 employees could face proposed assessments exceeding $1.4 million. Even employers who believe they were fully compliant may receive Letter 226-J due to data entry errors, miscommunication between the Marketplace and IRS, or mistakes in their ACA reporting. This comprehensive guide explains everything you need to know about what Letter 226-J is, how the IRS uses it, and how to respond effectively.
Letter 226-J is the official IRS correspondence used to notify Applicable Large Employers of proposed Employer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP) penalties under the Affordable Care Act. When the IRS determines, based on information from your filed Forms 1095-C and Marketplace data, that you may owe penalties for failing to offer adequate health coverage to your full-time employees, Letter 226-J is the mechanism through which they communicate this proposed assessment.
The letter itself is actually a package of documents that together provide the complete picture of the proposed penalty. Understanding what Letter 226-J is requires understanding each component:
The IRS sends Letter 226-J via certified mail to the address on file from your most recently filed Form 1094-C. This is a critical point because many employers have the wrong address on file, leading to missed notices and lost dispute opportunities. The letter is dated, and the response deadline is calculated from that date, regardless of when you actually receive it.
The IRS developed the Letter 226-J process as the formal enforcement mechanism for the ACA's employer shared responsibility provisions. When the ACA was enacted in 2010, it created requirements for large employers to offer health coverage or face penalties. However, the enforcement mechanism took years to implement. The IRS began issuing Letter 226-J notices in late 2017 for tax year 2015, and the process has continued annually since then.
The purpose of Letter 226-J is to:
Importantly, Letter 226-J is a "proposed" assessment, not a final determination. This distinction is critical because it means you have the opportunity to dispute the penalties before they become legally binding. However, this opportunity is time-limited, and failure to respond properly can result in losing your dispute rights entirely.
Before the IRS sends Letter 226-J, it conducts a comprehensive data-matching process that compares information from multiple sources. Understanding this process helps explain why you might receive a letter even if you believe you were fully compliant:
Step 1: Forms 1094-C and 1095-C Analysis
The IRS reviews the Forms 1094-C (transmittal) and 1095-C (employee statements) that you filed. These forms contain information about whether you offered coverage, the affordability of that coverage, and which employees were offered what. The IRS looks for indicators that might suggest non-compliance, such as:
Step 2: Marketplace Premium Tax Credit Data
The IRS receives data from the Health Insurance Marketplace (Healthcare.gov and state exchanges) about individuals who received premium tax credits (PTCs) to help pay for their coverage. This data includes the employer information these individuals provided when applying for Marketplace coverage.
Step 3: Data Matching
The IRS matches the Marketplace data against your filed 1095-C forms. If an employee who received a PTC appears on your ACA filings as a full-time employee who was not offered affordable, minimum value coverage, this mismatch triggers a potential penalty. The Letter 226-J is generated when this matching process identifies one or more employees who received PTCs and your filed forms suggest coverage wasn't properly offered.
Step 4: Penalty Calculation
Based on the matching results, the IRS calculates the proposed penalty. The penalty amount depends on whether Section 4980H(a) or 4980H(b) applies:
Understanding the typical timeline for Letter 226-J helps employers prepare and maintain proper records:
| Tax Year | ACA Forms Due | Letter 226-J Typically Issued | Response Window |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | March 31, 2025 | Fall 2026 - Spring 2027 | 30 days from letter date |
| 2025 | March 31, 2026 | Fall 2027 - Spring 2028 | 30 days from letter date |
| 2026 | March 31, 2027 | Fall 2028 - Spring 2029 | 30 days from letter date |
The IRS typically issues Letter 226-J notices 12 to 24 months after the relevant ACA filing deadline. This delay exists because the IRS needs time to receive and process all the ACA forms, obtain Marketplace data, conduct the matching process, and calculate penalties. However, the IRS has shown variation in this timeline, sometimes issuing letters earlier or later than expected. Employers should maintain complete ACA records for at least seven years to ensure they can respond to any Letter 226-J they receive.
The main Letter 226-J document provides an overview of the proposed penalty assessment. Key information includes:
The cover letter also explains the penalties under IRC Section 4980H and provides general information about why you may have been assessed penalties. Pay close attention to the response deadline, as missing this date can result in automatic assessment of the full proposed penalty.
Form 14764 is the response form you must complete and return to the IRS. This form allows you to indicate whether you:
When completing Form 14764 for Letter 226-J, be specific about your response. If you're disputing penalties, clearly indicate which employees and which months you're disputing. Attach supporting documentation such as enrollment records, offer letters, payroll data showing employee hours, and any corrected 1095-C forms you've filed.
Form 14765 accompanies Letter 226-J and lists each employee whose receipt of premium tax credits contributed to the proposed penalty. For each employee, the form shows:
This listing is crucial for your response. Review each employee carefully to identify:
For more complex cases, Letter 226-J may include Form 14765-A, which provides month-by-month penalty calculations. This form is particularly useful for understanding:
Use Form 14765-A to focus your response efforts on the months and calculations where you have the strongest case for disputing penalties.
Some employers receive Letter 226-J because they genuinely failed to comply with ACA requirements. Common legitimate triggers include:
1. Failure to Offer Coverage to 95% of Full-Time Employees
If your organization didn't offer minimum essential coverage to at least 95% of your full-time employees (those working 30+ hours per week on average), you may legitimately owe 4980H(a) penalties. This often happens when employers misclassify employees or don't have proper systems to track hours.
2. Unaffordable Coverage
Even if you offered coverage, if the employee contribution exceeded the affordability threshold (9.02% of household income for 2025), employees could legitimately obtain PTCs and trigger 4980H(b) penalties. Many employers don't realize how strict the affordability requirements are, particularly for lower-wage workers.
3. Coverage That Didn't Provide Minimum Value
Plans must pay at least 60% of expected health care costs to provide minimum value. If your plan design was too lean, employees could legitimately obtain PTCs even though you offered coverage.
4. Failure to Offer Dependent Coverage
Coverage must extend to dependent children up to age 26. Employers who only offered employee-only coverage failed to meet the full offer requirement, potentially triggering penalties.
Many Letter 226-J notices contain errors or are based on incorrect information. Common situations where assessments may be wrong include:
1. Incorrect Employee Classifications
2. Form 1095-C Coding Errors
3. Marketplace Data Errors
4. Limited Non-Assessment Period Issues
When you receive Letter 226-J, time is critical. Your response is due within 30 days of the letter date, not the date you receive it. If you receive the letter late (perhaps due to address issues), you may already have limited time remaining. Contact the IRS immediately if you need an extension.
Critical first steps:
Go through Form 14765 employee by employee. For each person listed, determine:
Create a spreadsheet to track your analysis of each employee. This will help you identify patterns and prepare your response documentation.
For each employee you plan to dispute, gather documentation that supports your position:
If your analysis reveals that your original Forms 1095-C contained errors, file corrected forms immediately. Common corrections include:
Filing corrected forms before or alongside your Letter 226-J response strengthens your position by showing the IRS what the accurate information should have been.
Based on your analysis, complete Form 14764 to indicate your response:
If You Agree Fully:
If You Disagree Fully or Partially:
If You Need More Time:
Send your Letter 226-J response via certified mail or another trackable method. Keep copies of:
Do not fax or email your response unless specifically instructed by the IRS. The response address is provided in the letter.
After receiving your Letter 226-J response, the IRS will review your documentation and make a determination. This process can take several months. During this time:
Following the IRS review, you'll receive one of several possible letters:
Letter 227-J (Penalty Reduced or Eliminated):
If the IRS agrees with some or all of your dispute, you'll receive Letter 227-J showing the revised (or eliminated) penalty amount. This is the best outcome for disputed assessments.
Letter 227-K (Penalty Confirmed):
If the IRS rejects your dispute and confirms the original penalty, you'll receive Letter 227-K. This letter makes the assessment final unless you request a conference or appeal.
Letter 227-L (Conference Scheduled):
In some cases, the IRS may schedule a conference to discuss the disputed items. This is an opportunity to present your case verbally.
Letter 227-M (No Response Received):
If you don't respond to Letter 226-J by the deadline, you'll receive Letter 227-M confirming the full penalty assessment. At this point, your options are extremely limited.
If the IRS confirms penalties after your dispute, you generally have the right to:
These appeal rights have their own deadlines and procedures, so act promptly if you receive an unfavorable determination.
The best way to avoid Letter 226-J is accurate ACA reporting in the first place. Key practices include:
Ensure your health coverage program meets ACA requirements:
Maintain comprehensive records to support your compliance:
When you receive Letter 226-J, the proposed penalties will be based on the indexed amounts for the applicable tax year:
| Tax Year | 4980H(a) Penalty | 4980H(b) Penalty | Monthly 4980H(a) | Monthly 4980H(b) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $2,880/employee | $4,320/employee | $240/employee | $360/employee |
| 2025 | $2,970/employee | $4,460/employee | $247.50/employee | $371.67/employee |
| 2026 (Projected) | ~$3,060/employee | ~$4,590/employee | ~$255/employee | ~$382.50/employee |
The proposed penalty on your Letter 226-J is calculated based on whether 4980H(a) or 4980H(b) applies:
4980H(a) Calculation Example:
If you have 200 full-time employees and failed to offer MEC to 95% of them in any month where an employee received a PTC:
4980H(b) Calculation Example:
If you offered coverage to all employees but 15 received PTCs due to affordability issues:
Letter 226-J is the official IRS notice used to propose Employer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP) penalties against Applicable Large Employers under the Affordable Care Act. When the IRS data-matching process indicates that an employer may have failed to offer adequate health coverage to full-time employees (resulting in those employees receiving premium tax credits for Marketplace coverage), Letter 226-J communicates the proposed penalty amount and provides an opportunity to respond before the assessment becomes final.
You have 30 days from the date on Letter 226-J to respond. This deadline is calculated from the letter date, not when you receive it. If you need more time, contact the IRS phone number listed on the letter before the deadline to request an extension. The IRS generally grants reasonable extension requests, but you must ask before the original deadline expires. Missing the deadline can result in automatic assessment of the full proposed penalty.
Yes, you can dispute Letter 226-J penalties by responding with Form 14764 and supporting documentation. Common grounds for dispute include: employees were incorrectly classified as full-time, coverage was offered but not properly reported, safe harbor codes should have been applied, employees were in valid waiting periods, or Marketplace data is incorrect. Provide detailed explanations and documentation for each employee you're disputing, and file corrected Forms 1095-C if your original filings contained errors.
Form 14765 is the Employee Premium Tax Credit (PTC) Listing that accompanies Letter 226-J. It lists each full-time employee whose receipt of premium tax credits contributed to the proposed penalty. For each employee, the form shows their name, Social Security Number, months they received PTCs, and the penalty amount attributed to them. Review this form carefully to identify employees who may have been listed in error or whose 1095-C was filed incorrectly.
If you don't respond to Letter 226-J within 30 days, the IRS will issue Letter 227-M confirming the full proposed penalty assessment. At that point, the penalty becomes final, and your options for disputing it are severely limited. You may still have some appeal rights, but they're much more restricted than if you had responded timely. The IRS will proceed with collection actions, which can include notices of balance due, levies, and liens.
The type of penalty shown on Letter 226-J depends on your coverage offer. Section 4980H(a) applies if you failed to offer minimum essential coverage to at least 95% of full-time employees in any month. Section 4980H(b) applies if you offered coverage to 95%+ but specific employees received PTCs because coverage wasn't offered to them, wasn't affordable, or didn't provide minimum value. Your letter and Form 14765-A (if included) will indicate which penalty type applies.
Yes, if your original Forms 1095-C contained errors, you should file corrected forms promptly. Corrections should be filed as soon as you discover errors, ideally before or concurrent with your Letter 226-J response. Include copies of corrected forms with your response and explain what was changed and why. Filing corrections shows the IRS what the accurate information should have been and strengthens your dispute position.
Yes, many employers work with tax professionals, employee benefits attorneys, or their benefits advisors when responding to Letter 226-J. Given the complexity of ACA rules and the potential penalty amounts involved, professional assistance is often worthwhile. A professional can help analyze the employee listings, identify valid dispute grounds, gather appropriate documentation, and prepare a comprehensive response. Some ACA software providers also offer support services.
This is a common Letter 226-J dispute scenario. If you offered affordable, minimum value coverage to an employee but they still received a PTC, the Marketplace may have incorrectly determined their eligibility. To dispute, gather documentation showing: the coverage offer was made, the employee's required contribution (proving affordability), and the plan's minimum value. File a corrected 1095-C if the original didn't properly reflect the offer, and explain the situation in your response.
The IRS sends Letter 226-J notices once per tax year, typically 12-24 months after the ACA filing deadline for that year. For example, for tax year 2025 (forms due March 31, 2026), you might receive Letter 226-J in late 2027 or early 2028. However, if you receive an unfavorable determination and the IRS later discovers additional issues, you could receive additional correspondence. The IRS has a three-year statute of limitations for assessment from the filing date.
To be prepared for a potential Letter 226-J, maintain comprehensive records including: enrollment forms and coverage election documentation, open enrollment materials and offer communications, payroll records showing hours worked, plan documents and summary plan descriptions, copies of all filed 1094-C and 1095-C forms, and records of safe harbor calculations. Keep these records for at least seven years after the applicable tax year to ensure availability for any IRS inquiry.
Yes, after you respond to Letter 226-J, the IRS reviews your documentation and may adjust the proposed penalty. The penalty could be reduced to zero (if you successfully dispute all employees), reduced partially (if some disputes are accepted), confirmed (if the IRS rejects your disputes), or in rare cases, increased if additional issues are discovered. You'll receive a follow-up letter (227-J, 227-K, or similar) indicating the IRS's determination.
Understanding what is Letter 226-J is essential, but even better is having the systems in place to avoid receiving one entirely. BoomTax provides comprehensive ACA compliance solutions designed to help Applicable Large Employers meet their obligations and minimize the risk of penalty assessments:
When accurate ACA reporting is filed through BoomTax, the IRS data-matching process is more likely to confirm compliance rather than identify discrepancies. Proper coding and documentation create a defensible record that can quickly refute erroneous Letter 226-J assessments if they occur.
For employers who prefer comprehensive support, BoomTax also offers ACA reporting services where our team handles the entire filing process. Either way, you gain the peace of mind that comes from knowing your ACA compliance is handled correctly.
Ready to protect your organization from ACA penalties? Get started with BoomTax today and file your ACA forms with confidence.
Understanding what is Letter 226-J is essential knowledge for every Applicable Large Employer. This IRS notice represents the enforcement mechanism for the ACA employer mandate, and receiving one triggers a time-sensitive process with significant financial implications. For tax year 2025, potential penalties reach $2,970 per employee under Section 4980H(a) and $4,460 per employee receiving premium tax credits under Section 4980H(b), making proper compliance and response procedures critically important.
Key takeaways about Letter 226-J:
The best strategy is prevention through accurate ACA compliance and reporting. Using reliable ACA reporting software like BoomTax ensures your Forms 1095-C are filed correctly with appropriate codes, reducing the likelihood of receiving Letter 226-J in the first place. When you do maintain proper records and file accurate forms, you're also prepared to quickly respond to any notices that do arrive.
BoomTax and its affiliates do not provide tax, legal, or accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal, or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal, and accounting advisors prior to engaging in any transaction.